Evaluation Plan
Adapted from Take Action! California (www.takeactionca.com)
Registration
At registration, you should collect basic information about the participants. This information identifies the participant’s level of interest in being physically active, and these answers serve two purposes. First, they can give you baseline information so you can tailor programs to their level of interest. Second, by asking the stages of change question on the Registration Form at the beginning of the program as well as on the evaluation form at the end of the program, the Program Coordinator will be able to determine if participants moved to a higher stage over the time period that the program was implemented. An analysis of these answers will help to determine the effectiveness of the program. You can also ask participants to set individual goals.
During the Program
During the program, you should collect information about the workshops and activities you offer. You should track basic participation information such as how many people attended sessions, joined a challenge program or walked to or during work. If your program includes classes or activities, you should also ask participants to evaluate the sessions by giving them short surveys to fill out. Ask them how useful the program was, as well as questions about whether the time of day and the length of the program were convenient for them. This information can help you plan future programs.
Final Evaluation
At the end of the program, ask participants the staging question again. Their answers will allow you to see if people moved from one stage of change to the next. Movement to higher stages indicates that the program was successful. You should also determine if people reached their final goals. Other questions to ask include:
Data Collection
The Planning Committee should decide early on how it will collect data from the participants in hard copy or on-line. If the company is not very big, participants can submit their information directly to the Program Coordinator. In a large company, the participants can submit their information to Team Captains. The Team Captains can then provide a summary to the coordinator. Whatever system is developed, it should minimize the paperwork for participants, Team Captains, and committee members. Too many evaluation questions or forms can be a barrier to participation.
We Collected Data. Now What?
Evaluation has three important functions. You can use the results of the evaluation to:
A Note about Forms
Take Action! California provides a kit on its website (www.takeactionca.com) with forms that can be used or adapted to evaluate programs. If you decide to develop your own forms, keep these points in mind:
As with any program that is costing company resources, measures of effectiveness are important to determining and shaping the future of the program. Conducting any evaluation of a program - judging the satisfaction of participants, the number of classes held, or the impact - is better than no evaluation. Program managers that do not assess their methods, direction or potential impact and outcomes may have a limited understanding of their program and may lack the data to justify future program funding. Most disturbing, they may not be making any impact on their community. This type of self-examination will help ensure that programs, new paths, trails and parks are both promoted and maintained.
In addition to measuring the output and impact evaluations following a program, it is important to conduct process evaluations throughout the project cycle. Process measures include evaluating the way that the program was organized, initial participation, and internal buy-in from management.
For workplace wellness programs, the following evaluations are recommended:
| Metric | Means of Measurement |
| Participation/Attrition |
|
| Program Completion |
|
Diet/activity changes, including:
|
Logs or self-report survey before and after intervention at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months |
To determine scientific significance of the program, compare outcomes of a group of participants to a control group of non-participants. Look for changes in:
|
|
| Budgetary issues |
|